#VELOCE DOUBLE PDF MANUAL#
#VELOCE DOUBLE PDF FULL#

If you have a 28.6 mm (1 1/8 inches) then you must use the 111 mm bottom bracket. Bottom bracket length is dependant upon the diameter of your seat tube where the front derailleur mounts.Wider profile requires a symmetrical 111 or 115 mm Campagnolo or Phil Wood bottom bracket.Except for the graphics, Veloce Triple uses the same arms as the Centaur Triple crankset. Both of the crank arms are precisely machined, polished and anodized for a beautiful and long lasting finish.Designed with finite element analysis (FEM) and cold drop forged for maximum strength and performance.Two models one for 8 or 9 speed systems and another for 10 speed drivetrains.

It weighs just 731 grams for a 170 mm length crankset with 30/42/52 rings.

Campagnolo's inexpensive, light and durable triple ring crankset.

Note also that the only medium cage mech Campag now do is Veloce yet they make 13-29s all the way to Super Record.Campagnolo Veloce Triple 8/9 and 10 Speed Cranksets: illeur.pdf - P20Īnd I have checked that they still list the 13-29!

#VELOCE DOUBLE PDF MANUAL#

Note - the Campag 10s rear derailleur manual states that the short cage derailleur is suitable for all 10 speed Campagnolo sprocket sets. Bear in mind that a very common choice is 50-34, 11/25 which gives a wrap of 30. As I said, the mechanism even on 50 - 29 has some remaining movement though it doesn't look pretty! I find it hard to believe that the published range can be 29 if you get that from 50-34, 13/26. 34-29 is, from what I recall of Campags guidance, only just beyond what should be definitely doable. I've got it up Steyning Bostal but it don't 'arf 'urt on the 'ills!!!! Now that is old school and not the lightest thing in the world. That's not going to give you a particularly low gear.ģ9-26 = gear ratio 1.5 (= pick your kneecaps up on the way back)ģ4 - 25 = gear ratio 1.36 (my original compact setup)ģ4 - 29 = gear ratio 1.17 (my 'hardcore' climbing rig!!)ģ9 - 29 = gear ratio 1.34 (what you could get without a compact).Ĭoincidentally, your 39-26 is exactly the same ratio as the 42-28 on my 1980 Raleigh Record Ace. Think I'll be going for a 26-13 cassette then. He's running 32 so my guess is that the mech is running a little tight if he goes big/big but most good cyclists will avoid that So assuming Rolf has the perfect length chain stays, he can add a couple more to the his bike's capacity and end up with 31. If the difference between the unrounded result and the recommended chain length is just a small fraction over an inch, then it's assumed you can add a couple more to the capacity (if it's near a whole inch on the other hand, then you're probably not going to be able to). Park tools 'rigorous' equation is the best - and there's a javascript calculator here: Now, to save buying your mech and cassette and finding out you've fallen into this worst case, you can use a chain length calculator to work out what your ideal chain length should be. So in this worst case - to start with, you've just about lost the capacity of two links before you've even started. So in worse case, you could end up with a chain with an extra 0.9 of an inch longer than ideal (if you were to remove a couple more links, it would be 0.1 of an inch too short and not fit). However, you can't exactly shorten the chain to fit this perfect configuration as a chain can only be shortened by one inch at a time (two links).

#VELOCE DOUBLE PDF FULL#

On big/big, it should be at it's full extent - and ideally, this should accommodate the length of the chain. If you think about what the rear cage is doing, it's taking up slack in the chain. The answer is the actual chain length and how it fits over the teeth. So for Rolf, 29 would appear to be the maximum capacity of his setup - though he's running 32 with no problem? Now, these numbers are very conservative, and it's widely assumed that you can go a couple higher without issue. (all modern Campag mechs can take a maximum rear sprocket size of 29 - but note, that's total teeth, not wrap/capacity) Medium cage (72.5mm) has a wrap of 36 and 'Officially', Campag says that the short cage (55mm between jockey axles) can accommodate a wrap of 27. So it's a measure (in teeth or chain links) of how much chain the cage has to be able to suck up and still keep perfect tension.įor example, for Rolf's setup 13/29 and 34/50, the capacity is (29-13)+(50-34) = 32.

The capacity or 'wrap' is the difference in total teeth between the small/small combination and the big/big combination. Whether you can use a short cage with a particular range of rings and sprockets (technically) depends upon the groups 'capacity' and the chain-stay length. I got this info from another post - but can't find it at the moment.

Veloce double pdf